What it shows
It shows the approach can find real gaps. This is a proof of concept. It is the first step, as the complete service can demonstrate actionable intelligence.
The pieces exist. They do not line up on their own.
Funders, workers, landowners and projects already exist across climate action. What is missing is a way to bring them together around where the money, the place and the need meet. That does not happen on its own, which is part of why climate action takes so long. Putting these fragmented pieces side by side shows the same enabling factors across every category of climate action.
What we are testing
Most funding recipients work with only one or two partners to meet their funding requirements, which leaves impact on the table.
Projects that reach out to additional stakeholders in groups are more likely to succeed.
Communities want to participate. Combining outreach with impact data helps that potential show up.
Environmental startups that work closely with economic development organizations in their region are more likely to succeed.
We are collecting field data to test each of these.
Why we track it this way
Climate spending rarely starts by looking at the whole problem. When funding arrives, the first step is usually to start work, not to map every cause involved. TruSemble keeps that full picture up to date, so when money is allocated, the people involved can reach out and make better decisions. Because the most useful information comes from talking to people, we track it in a CRM next to the carbon impact project data.
A look at the dashboard
Illustrative example with generic organization names. Not live data. Contact us for a walkthrough.
Want a walkthrough? Write to info@trusemble.com